Ofwat’s new powers prevent bonuses being funded from customer bills if the company is judged to have missed environmental or performance targets.
Thames Water chief executive Chris Weston, who was hired in January to try and turn around the fortunes of a company drowning in debts, was awarded a bonus of £195,000 for his first three months at the company, taking his total pay for the period to £437,000.
It’s not clear whether the bonus has in fact been paid out, but the regulator’s rules now mean it cannot paid by the operating company, and must be borne by the company owners.
Thames Water declined to comment.
Other companies – including debt-laden Southern Water – have already said shareholders rather than customers would pay bonuses to executives.
But the problem for Thames is that it effectively has no shareholders.
Earlier this year, Thames Water owners refused to follow through with a promised cash injection for the troubled company after Ofwat indicated it was not prepared to accept requests for bill rises of 44% above inflation over the next five years.
In a preliminary decision, Ofwat said it would allow bill rises of 21% above inflation, which the shareholders did not accept.
They walked away, effectively leaving the company under the control of its lenders.
Environment secretary Steve Reed said it was “disgraceful” that half of water firms have given out “unjustifiable” and “unmerited” bonuses.
He said the introduction of “urgent legislation” was so that such bonus culture can “never happen again”.
Reed had previously said he believed the problems in the sector as a whole were ones of “regulation and governance” and he recently commissioned Sir John Cunliffe, former deputy governor of the bank of England, to conduct an independent review of the sector.
That review is not due to report back until June of next year. The final determination of how much water companies can charge their customers for the next five years is expected on 19 December.
