HomeBussinessWaspi: Fury as women hit by state pension age rise are denied...

Waspi: Fury as women hit by state pension age rise are denied payouts

Date:

Related stories

Sharp fall in UK business activity forecast as economic gloom deepens

British firms are predicting a sharp fall in business...

UK businesses brace for economic gloom in 2025

Sign up for the View from Westminster email for...

Contemporary Art Curator – Job | ArtsHub UK – Arts Industry News, Jobs & Career Advice

Job Summary This dynamic curatorial role is central to the...

Administration Officer – Job | ArtsHub UK – Arts Industry News, Jobs & Career Advice

Job Summary A fantastic opportunity to gain a wide range...

Estates Administrator – Job | ArtsHub UK – Arts Industry News, Jobs & Career Advice

Job Summary We are looking for an Estates Administrator to...
spot_imgspot_img

The Women Against State Pension Inequality (Waspi) campaign described the government’s decision as an “insult”.

“The government has today made an unprecedented political choice to ignore the clear recommendations of an independent watchdog,” said Angela Madden, who chairs the campaign group.

“This is a bizarre and totally unjustified move which will leave everyone asking what the point of an ombudsman is if ministers can simply ignore their decisions.”

The Waspi campaign had called for payments of at least £10,000 each.

But Kendall said there was evidence that there was “considerable awareness” of the changes to the pension age, and sending letters earlier would not have made a difference to their ability to make retirement choices.

She also said that there was no evidence of “direct financial loss” resulting from the government’s decision.

“Given the vast majority of women knew the state pension age was increasing, the government does not believe paying a flat rate to all women at a cost of up to £10.5bn would be fair or proportionate to taxpayers,” she said.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said he understood the concern of the Waspi women, but had to take into account whether it was right “to impose a further burden on the taxpayer”.

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

spot_img