HomeBussinessPost Office staff implicated in Horizon scandal may still be 'operating at...

Post Office staff implicated in Horizon scandal may still be ‘operating at heart’ of business

Date:

Related stories

UK exporters still struggling with post-Brexit rules, says trade body

Many exporters are still struggling with post-Brexit trading rules,...

Exeter Science boss appointed to head UK Science Park Association – South West

Sally Basker, chief executive of Exeter Science Park, has...

Nine-year-old boy killed in Christmas market attack named – latest

Athena Stavrou22 December 2024 13:41Eyewitness describes ‘war-like conditions’In the...

Guinness raids its Irish reserves to ease UK shortages amid gen Z demand

Guinness is raiding its reserves in Ireland to boost...
spot_imgspot_img

Post Office employees “implicated” in the Horizon scandal may “still be operating at the heart” of the business, the inquiry into it has heard.

Chief executive Nick Read was on Thursday questioned about issues around staff who played a part in wrongful prosecutions and investigations of sub postmasters before 2015.

Jason Beer KC asked whether, during a meeting in January with the then Post Office minister Kevin Hollinrake, the government was “green lighting” action against employees.

Nick Read replied that it “does sound like it” but admitted the Post Office has “dragged our feet” and not been “robust” in acting.

Addressing Mr Read, Mr Beer then said: “The issue is the potential for individuals who still may be operating at the heart of Post Office who are implicated in events in the past, isn’t it?”

Mr Read replied: “That is the case and, as I’ve been very clear, where we get formal allegations we will act. Pre-emptively we have struggled to move people on from the organisation.”

Read more
Alan Bates knighted – and threatens legal action
Post Office boss resigns
Second Post Office scandal comparable to Horizon

Hundreds of sub postmasters were wrongfully convicted due to faulty Horizon computer software used by the Post Office between 1999 and 2015.

In one of his witness statements, Mr Read also says the Post Office kept investigators employed because they have “human rights”.

He writes he would have “preferred” that more “decisive action” had been taken, and he had aired those views to the board.

He describes a “collective decision” not to “simply dismiss anyone who was, for instance, an investigator at the time but against whom there was no direct evidence of wrongdoing, rather to transfer them to other departments”.

He asserts that unless wrongdoing can be proven, the Post Office “cannot simply remove existing staff because they were in post when the miscarriages of justice were taking place”.

“Those individuals of course have employment and indeed human rights themselves,” he says.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Outgoing Post Office boss ‘doesn’t need to clear his name’

Three people under investigation

On Wednesday, it emerged three individuals are currently under investigation by the Post Office and outside agencies over their conduct around the Horizon scandal.

Allegations against the individuals had emerged in restorative justice hearings with victims.

The inquiry also heard details about the new contracts in place for sub postmasters that mention the Post Office Investigation Division (POID).

Mr Beer questioned how appropriate the contract currently is in telling sub postmasters the POID has investigatory powers including “an evidential interview process under caution”.

Mr Read admitted the wording was “heavy handed” and agreed it needed “addressing, not just rewording”.

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

He also told the inquiry it was “astonishing” the Post Office was involved in the administration of compensation schemes.

He said the “corporate view” was that the Post Office should not have anything to do with them.

When asked why that view was not communicated to the inquiry, Mr Read responded: “It’s a good question. I’m unsure why we didn’t make that very explicit… clearly we should have done.”

He described it as a “failure”.

The inquiry continues.

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

spot_img